[Aug-2026] The SAVE International CVS Exam Test For Brief Preparation
Revolutionary Guide To Exam SAVE International Dumps
NEW QUESTION # 84
Lower-order functions are
Choose 2 answers.
- A. located outside of the right scope line.
- B. referred to as "assumed" functions.
- C. an output of the VM Study.
- D. generally determined by the customer.
Answer: A,B
Explanation:
The correct answers are A and B . In FAST-based Function Analysis, lower-order functions are also known as assumed or causative functions because they represent the initiating input that causes, enables, or "turns on" the project, product, process, or service. SAVE's Value Methodology glossary defines a lower-order function as the function selected to initiate the project, product, or process and identifies it as an input outside the subject scope. ( ) The SAVE glossary also states that lower-order functions are not part of the VM study scope and are inputs for the project, product, process, service, or organization.
In a FAST diagram, the study scope is bounded by scope lines. The subject scope lies between the higher- order and lower-order functions; therefore, lower-order functions are positioned outside the study boundary on the input side, conventionally beyond the right scope line. ( ) They are not an output of the VM Study; rather, they are boundary-condition inputs used to establish the function logic path. They are also not generally determined by the customer; customer needs are more closely associated with higher-order functions and value requirements.
References/topics: Function Analysis Phase; FAST Diagramming; Lower-Order Functions; Assumed
/Causative Functions; Scope Lines.
NEW QUESTION # 85
Some stakeholders disagree with their level of involvement in the VM study scope. What tool could the VM facilitator use to focus the group?
- A. RACI matrix
- B. Work breakdown structure
- C. SWOT analysis
- D. Paired comparison
Answer: A
Explanation:
The correct answer is C. RACI matrix . When stakeholders disagree about their level of involvement, the facilitator needs a tool that clarifies roles, responsibility, authority, consultation, and communication expectations . A RACI matrix directly addresses this issue because it defines who is Responsible , Accountable , Consulted , and Informed for each activity or decision. In VM and VE practice, a RACI matrix is specifically used to identify who is responsible for implementation, who is accountable for costs and outcomes, who needs to be consulted during VM/VE studies, and who needs to be kept informed.
This makes RACI especially useful when involvement levels become controversial. It gives the facilitator a neutral structure to move the group away from personal preference and toward agreed participation logic. It also helps prevent over-involvement, under-involvement, unclear decision authority, and unnecessary stakeholder conflict.
A work breakdown structure defines work packages, not stakeholder engagement levels. SWOT analysis examines strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, but does not assign participation roles. Paired comparison is used for prioritizing options or criteria, not resolving involvement disagreements.
References/topics: VM Facilitation and Team Dynamics; Stakeholder Engagement; Study Scope Alignment; RACI Matrix; VM Program Governance.
NEW QUESTION # 86
Subject information:
Service Life = 12 years
Fuel = $9.00 per liter
Annual kilometers driven = 40,000 kilometers
Car A: Paid $40,000 , needs batteries every two years at $600 , needs tires every two years at $1,000 , fuel efficiency = 10 kilometers per liter .
Car B: Paid $50,000 , needs tires every two years at $2,000 , fuel efficiency = 15 kilometer per liter .
Car C: Paid $60,000 , needs tires every two years at $4,000 , fuel efficiency = 20 kilometer per liter .
What are the repair and replacement costs for Car B for the service life of the vehicle?
- A. $10,000
- B. $4,000
- C. $6,000
- D. $12,000
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is B. $12,000 . This question asks only for the repair and replacement costs of Car B , not the full life-cycle cost. Therefore, the initial purchase price of $50,000 and the fuel cost data are irrelevant for this specific calculation. The only repair/replacement item listed for Car B is tires every two years at
$2,000 .
The service life is 12 years . Since tires are replaced every 2 years , the number of replacement cycles is:
12 years ÷ 2 years = 6 replacement cycles
The total repair and replacement cost is therefore:
6 × $2,000 = $12,000
Option A. $6,000 would represent only three tire replacements, which does not cover the full 12-year service life. Option C. $10,000 would represent five replacements; that approach would exclude the final two-year replacement interval, but this question's wording asks for costs for the service life , so the full 12-year period is counted. Option D. $4,000 covers only two replacement cycles and is clearly incomplete.
In the Evaluation Phase, the CVS candidate must separate initial cost , annual operating cost , and periodic repair/replacement cost before performing life-cycle calculations. This question isolates the periodic replacement-cost component only.
References/topics: Evaluation Phase; Life-Cycle Cost; Repair and Replacement Costs; Recurrent Cost; Cost Classification.
NEW QUESTION # 87
Carpet and vinyl tile are acceptable alternatives for an owner to cover 1,000 square meters of floor.
Carpet
Installation cost, including pad = $30 / square meter
Service life = 10 years
Maintenance cost: vacuum weekly = $500 / month
Maintenance cost: shampoo once per year = $3,000 / shampoo
Vinyl
Installation cost, including pad = $10 / square meter
Service life = 15 years
Maintenance cost: vacuum weekly = $400 / month
Maintenance cost: strip and wax once per month = $1,000 / strip and wax What is the initial cost of the carpet ?
- A. $33,000
- B. $30,000
- C. $32,500
- D. $36,000
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is A. $30,000 . The question asks only for the initial cost of the carpet, not its annual maintenance cost, life-cycle cost, present worth, or equivalent annual cost. In SAVE terminology, initial cost means the first expenditure required to acquire, produce, construct, or install the project, product, or process.
The SAVE VM Dictionary identifies initial cost as the initial expenditure of resources and also treats it as interchangeable with capital cost. It separately defines life-cycle cost as the sum of initial cost, recurrent annual cost, single expenditures, and disposal or salvage value over a defined period. Therefore, the maintenance costs and service-life data are distractors for this specific calculation.
The carpet covers 1,000 square meters , and the installation cost is $30 per square meter . The calculation is:
1,000 × $30 = $30,000
Options B, C, and D incorrectly imply that additional costs have been added to the initial installation cost. In the Evaluation Phase, CVS candidates must identify the cost category being requested before performing the calculation. SAVE's VM Standard places structured evaluation after creativity to compare alternatives while considering performance requirements and resource limits.
References/topics: Evaluation Phase; Initial Cost; Capital Cost; Life-Cycle Cost Analysis; Cost Classification.
NEW QUESTION # 88
What is the role of the client in the Information Phase?
- A. Explain the process
- B. Describe the project
- C. Define the agenda
- D. Define expectations
Answer: B
Explanation:
The correct answer is A. Describe the project . In the Information Phase , the client, project sponsor, designer, or owner representative provides the VM team with the factual background needed to understand the study subject. The SAVE Value Methodology Standard describes this phase as the point where the project sponsor and/or designer brief the value study team and allow the team to ask questions based on its data research. ( courses.washington.edu ) This briefing is essentially the client's role: to explain what the project is, why it exists, what conditions affect it, what constraints apply, and what information the VM team must understand before moving into Function Analysis. The client may describe project scope, objectives, operational needs, performance requirements, site conditions, budget concerns, schedule issues, and known limitations.
Option B , defining expectations, is more closely tied to study planning and sponsor alignment. Option C , explaining the process, is the facilitator's responsibility. Option D , defining the agenda, is also normally handled by the VM facilitator during preparation and workshop management.
References/topics: Information Phase; Client Briefing; Project Sponsor Role; Data Package; VM Job Plan.
NEW QUESTION # 89
What is the role of the VM facilitator during the Development Phase?
Choose 2 answers.
- A. Review VM proposals
- B. Rewrite VM proposals
- C. Research VM proposal background
- D. Prepare VM proposals
Answer: A,B
Explanation:
The correct answers are A. Review VM proposals and C. Rewrite VM proposals . During the Development Phase, selected ideas are converted into formal VM proposals with enough documentation for decision makers to determine whether implementation is justified. SAVE's VM Standard Reference states that, in this phase, the VM study team develops selected ideas into VM proposals with sufficient documentation for implementation decisions.
The facilitator's role is not to become the technical author or researcher for each proposal. Instead, the facilitator manages the process, maintains consistency, reviews proposal quality, checks clarity, confirms that required elements are included, and helps revise or rewrite proposal narratives so they are understandable, complete, and decision-ready. This aligns with the facilitator's broader duty to lead the multidisciplinary VM process, keep the team disciplined within the Job Plan, and ensure outputs support value-based decisions.
SAVE describes VM as a systematic process used by a multidisciplinary team led by a qualified VM facilitator.
Option B is incorrect because proposal preparation is primarily the responsibility of assigned team members or technical specialists. Option D is incorrect because background research is normally performed by the proposal owner or subject-matter experts, not by the facilitator as a primary role.
References/topics: Development Phase; VM Proposal Development; VM Facilitator Role; Proposal Review and Revision; VM Job Plan.
NEW QUESTION # 90
What are tools the VM facilitator might use during the Creativity Phase?
Choose 3 answers.
- A. RACI matrix
- B. Reverse brainstorming
- C. SWOT analysis
- D. Hitchhiking
- E. Mind-mapping
Answer: B,D,E
Explanation:
The correct answers are Reverse brainstorming, Hitchhiking, and Mind-mapping . In the Creativity Phase , the VM facilitator leads the team in generating many possible alternatives for performing the required functions identified during Function Analysis. The objective is divergent thinking: produce a broad range of ideas without judging them too early. SAVE's certification study material identifies creativity as a distinct VM Job Plan area and emphasizes idea generation before moving into Evaluation. ( ) Reverse brainstorming is appropriate because it helps the team approach a function or problem from the opposite direction, often revealing hidden assumptions and new solution paths. Hitchhiking is also a valid creativity technique because one team member builds on another person's idea, improving participation and expanding idea quantity. Mind-mapping supports creativity by visually organizing related thoughts around a central function or issue, helping the team see connections and generate additional alternatives.
SWOT analysis is not primarily a Creativity Phase tool; it is more commonly used for strategic assessment.
RACI matrix is also incorrect because it assigns responsibilities and accountabilities, which fits planning or implementation control, not creative idea generation.
References/topics: Creativity Phase; Idea Generation; Brainstorming Techniques; Divergent Thinking; VM Facilitation.
NEW QUESTION # 91
Which of the following actions would be appropriate to effectively report lessons learned for a VM program?
Choose 2 answers.
- A. Schedule a meeting with the team to discuss the lessons learned and how they can be applied in future projects.
- B. Create a summarized report of lessons learned and share it with the project team.
- C. Store the lessons learned report in a digital folder without any further distribution.
- D. Ignore the lessons learned discussion since the last project was successful.
Answer: A,B
Explanation:
The correct answers are A and C . In a VM Program, lessons learned should be captured, communicated, and converted into practical improvement for future value studies. Creating a summarized report and sharing it with the project team is appropriate because it records what worked, what did not work, what assumptions changed, what facilitation issues occurred, and what implementation barriers or success factors were observed.
Scheduling a team meeting is also appropriate because lessons learned are most useful when discussed, validated, and connected to future application. SAVE's VM Job Plan identifies Post-Study activity as completing changes, implementing changes, and monitoring status, with the objective of assuring implementation of approved recommendations. ( courses.washington.edu ) A lessons-learned review supports that same control mindset by improving future VM planning, team selection, facilitation, proposal development, and implementation follow-through.
Option B is weak because storing a report without distribution does not transfer knowledge. Option D is incorrect because successful projects still produce valuable positive lessons that should be repeated.
References/topics: VM Programs; Post-Study Activities; Lessons Learned; Knowledge Transfer; Continuous Improvement; VM Program Management.
NEW QUESTION # 92
Which of the following are typically documented in the "accepted" VM proposal status report?
Choose 3 answers.
- A. Performance impacts
- B. Tracking identification number
- C. VM study presentation
- D. Next update
- E. Report number
Answer: A,B,D
Explanation:
The correct answers are A. Next update, D. Tracking identification number, and E. Performance impacts . In the Implementation Phase, accepted VM proposals must be tracked so that the organization can confirm whether the approved value improvement is actually being carried into execution. The VM Guide explains that implementation status reports formally document and track the status of VM proposals and are used by VM program managers to follow implementation progress. It specifically identifies a tracking identification number as the code used to track the change within the organization, and it also requires discussion of performance impacts , including any deviation from the VM team's original performance assessment. ( pdfcoffee.com ) A next update is also appropriate because implementation status reporting is not a one-time record; it is a continuing control mechanism. The guide identifies "Next update" as the date of the next implementation status update. ( pdfcoffee.com ) Option C is incorrect because the VM study presentation is an input used earlier to resolve proposals, not a documented element of an accepted proposal status report. Option B is administrative and may appear in some organizations, but the essential accepted-proposal tracking content focuses on traceability, implementation follow-up, and validated impacts.
References/topics: Implementation Phase; Implementation Status Reports; Accepted VM Proposals; Tracking Identification Number; Performance Impacts; Next Update.
NEW QUESTION # 93
A function performance specification:
Choose 3 answers.
- A. assists in uncovering hidden assumptions.
- B. communicates customer performance wants and needs.
- C. puts parameters on VM team options.
- D. defines constraints on designers.
- E. accurately identifies requirements specific to functions.
Answer: A,B,E
Explanation:
The correct answers are A, D, and E . A Function Performance Specification is used to define performance requirements in terms of the functions that must be achieved, not in terms of a predetermined design solution.
In VM, value is linked to functions measured by the customer's performance requirements, and the methodology seeks alternate ways to accomplish a function while meeting customer performance expectations. ( ) Therefore, it accurately identifies requirements specific to functions . FPS characterizes each function through criteria, expected performance levels, and flexibility, which makes the requirement measurable and traceable.
( Value Analysis ) It also communicates customer performance wants and needs because it documents what the user or customer expects the solution to accomplish. The FPS approach expresses needs and expected performance without reference to a specific solution, allowing broader innovation while maintaining customer requirements. ( Value Analysis ) It also helps uncover hidden assumptions because vague wants must be translated into explicit criteria, levels, and flexibility. Option B is incorrect because FPS does not evaluate or limit VM team options; it defines functional performance expectations. Option C is incorrect because FPS should avoid constraining designers to a specific design.
References/topics: Function Analysis Phase; Function Performance Specification; Customer Requirements; Performance Criteria; Functional Requirements.
NEW QUESTION # 94
The VM study sponsor wants to limit the amount of time some of the VM team members participate. In which phases might the VM facilitator recommend these VM team members fully participate?
Choose 2 answers.
- A. Implementation phase
- B. Presentation phase
- C. Creativity phase
- D. Function analysis phase
Answer: C,D
Explanation:
The correct phases are Function Analysis Phase and Creativity Phase . When participation time must be limited, the VM facilitator should protect the phases where multidisciplinary team contribution has the highest effect on value improvement. The Function Analysis Phase is central because the team defines project functions in active verb / measurable noun form and analyzes which functions need improvement, elimination, or creation to meet study goals. SAVE's Value Methodology Standard identifies this phase as the point where the team defines and analyzes functions, making it essential for shared understanding and correct problem framing. ( ) The Creativity Phase is also critical because the team uses creative techniques to identify alternative ways to perform the required functions. Diverse participation here improves idea quantity, prevents narrow technical thinking, and helps avoid premature commitment to existing solutions. The Implementation Phase occurs after proposal approval and is not normally the best place to require full participation from time-limited team members. The Presentation Phase communicates developed recommendations, but full participation by every limited-time team member is less essential than their contribution during function definition and idea generation.
References/topics: VM Facilitation; Team Participation Planning; Function Analysis Phase; Creativity Phase; Multidisciplinary Team Dynamics.
NEW QUESTION # 95
Which of the following situations are MOST appropriate for using a RACI matrix?
Choose 2 answers.
- A. Misunderstood concepts
- B. Communication gaps
- C. Process flow
- D. Validated assumptions
Answer: A,B
Explanation:
The correct answers are B and D . A RACI matrix is most appropriate when the VM facilitator needs to clarify involvement, responsibility, accountability, consultation, and communication among participants or stakeholders. In the SAVE International Value Methodology Core Competencies, the RACI matrix is listed under the Information Phase as a method used to transform information, while process flowcharts are listed separately as a different technique. This distinction is important because a RACI matrix does not map process sequence; it clarifies roles and involvement.
A RACI chart defines who is Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed for project tasks, and it is used to reduce confusion, improve communication pathways, and establish clear ownership. ( Atlassian ) Therefore, it directly addresses communication gaps and misunderstood concepts related to who should act, decide, advise, or be kept informed.
Option A is incorrect because process-flow issues are better handled with a process flowchart. Option C is incorrect because validated assumptions do not require role clarification; they are already confirmed information.
References/topics: Information Phase; RACI Matrix; Methods to Transform Information; VM Facilitation; Stakeholder Communication.
NEW QUESTION # 96
Which of the following play a part in effective VM Facilitation?
Choose 3 answers.
- A. Belief in the group and its possibilities
- B. Technical knowledge in the subject area
- C. Practiced ability to plan appropriate group processes
- D. Familiarity of facilitation concepts and methods
- E. Recognizing disruptive behavior is personal
Answer: A,C,D
Explanation:
The correct answers are B, C, and D . Effective VM facilitation depends primarily on the facilitator's ability to guide a multidisciplinary team through a structured process, not on personally solving the technical problem. SAVE's VM Standard Reference defines VM as a systematic process used by a multidisciplinary team, led by a qualified VM facilitator , to improve value through function analysis. It also states that a VM study is facilitated by someone competent in VM techniques, ideally a CVS.
Therefore, the facilitator must have belief in the group and its possibilities because VM relies on team intelligence, cross-functional input, creativity, and consensus-building. The facilitator must also have familiarity with facilitation concepts and methods , including managing participation, conflict, divergent thinking, convergence, and decision flow. Finally, the facilitator needs a practiced ability to plan appropriate group processes , because each VM phase requires the right method, timing, participation structure, and output control.
Option A is incorrect because disruptive behavior should be managed objectively, not treated as personal.
Option E is not a core facilitation requirement; technical knowledge belongs mainly to subject-matter team members, while the facilitator protects the VM process.
References/topics: VM Facilitation and Team Dynamics; Facilitator Competence; Group Process Planning; Team Participation; VM Study Leadership.
NEW QUESTION # 97
Which of the following are appropriate techniques to achieve the expected output of the Evaluation Phase?
- A. Coarse, medium, and fine filters
- B. Blast-create-refine method
- C. Weighted evaluation technique
- D. Forced relationships method
Answer: A
Explanation:
The correct answer is C. Coarse, medium, and fine filters . In the VM Job Plan, the Evaluation Phase converts the large number of ideas generated during the Creativity Phase into a smaller, rationally selected group of ideas suitable for Development. SAVE's Value Methodology Standard states that the Evaluation Phase uses a structured evaluation process to select ideas with potential for value improvement while still delivering required functions and respecting performance requirements and resource limits. ( ) The SAVE International Core Competencies directly classify Evaluation Phase techniques as coarse filter, medium filter, and fine filter methods. These appear under "Apply Evaluation Techniques," with coarse filters representing simple screening, medium filters supporting intermediate comparison, and fine filters supporting more detailed evaluation before ideas move into development. ( ) Option A, weighted evaluation, can be part of a detailed or fine-filter evaluation, but it is not the complete filtering approach named in the CVS/VM Guide framework. Options B and D are more closely associated with idea generation or creative stimulation, not the primary structured filtering process of the Evaluation Phase.
References/topics: Evaluation Phase; Apply Evaluation Techniques; Coarse Filter; Medium Filter; Fine Filter; Idea Selection.
NEW QUESTION # 98
The project team expresses uncertainty about how their tasks align with the overall objectives of the VM Job Plan. What steps should the VM facilitator take to enhance understanding of the VM Job Plan?
Choose 2 answers.
- A. Present the VM Job Plan in detail with minimal interaction, allowing team members to ask questions at the end.
- B. Establish a deadline for project members to complete their preparation.
- C. Facilitate a discussion to improve their understanding of how their tasks contribute to the VM Job Plan.
- D. Encourage a collaborative environment by pairing project and VM team members for more in-depth discussions of each other's roles.
Answer: C,D
Explanation:
The correct answers are A and B . The issue in the scenario is not lack of a deadline; it is lack of shared understanding of how individual responsibilities support the VM Job Plan. SAVE describes Value Methodology as a multidisciplinary team process used to improve project value through function analysis, and the VM Standard requires the Value Study Team to include experienced professionals and project stakeholders selected for their expertise and project experience. Therefore, pairing project and VM team members for deeper role discussion is appropriate because it builds cross-functional understanding, clarifies responsibilities, and improves team integration.
Option B is also correct because the facilitator should actively guide discussion so team members understand how their tasks contribute to the structured Job Plan. SAVE's Study Guide states that the Job Plan supports team synergy within a structured process rather than a collection of individual opinions, and each phase provides information and understanding needed for the next phase. SAVE's glossary also defines a facilitator as a substantively neutral person who enables the group to improve problem solving, decision making, and effectiveness while leading the group through the VM Job Plan.
Option C is weaker because a low-interaction lecture does not address uncertainty effectively. Option D manages schedule compliance, not understanding or alignment.
References/topics: VM Facilitation; Team Dynamics; VM Job Plan; Multidisciplinary Team; Facilitator Role.
NEW QUESTION # 99
What tool could the VM study team use to show customer satisfaction?
- A. Quality function deployment
- B. Resource model
- C. Quality management plan
- D. Customer FAST
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is Customer FAST . In Value Methodology, FAST is used in the Function Analysis Phase to model how functions relate to each other and to clarify what the project must accomplish from a functional perspective. The customer-oriented version of FAST is specifically designed to reflect that the customer determines value in the function analysis process. The SAVE study guide describes the Customer-Oriented FAST model as a variation that adds customer-focused support functions such as "attract users," "satisfy users," "assure dependability," and "assure convenience." ( ) This makes Customer FAST the best tool when the study team wants to show customer satisfaction as part of the value logic. Quality Function Deployment can capture or translate the voice of the customer, but the question asks for a tool to show customer satisfaction within the VM function structure. A quality management plan is a project quality control document, not a VM function model. A resource model addresses inputs or resource use rather than customer-perceived value. Therefore, Customer FAST is the most technically precise answer.
References/topics: Function Analysis Phase; FAST Diagramming; Customer-Oriented FAST; Customer Attitude; Function Modeling.
NEW QUESTION # 100
......
CVS Free Study Guide! with New Questions: https://www.examcollectionpass.com/SAVE-International/CVS-practice-exam-dumps.html